Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596654›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Long-term spatial patterns in COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake.

Anthony J Wood, Anne Marie MacKintosh, Martine Stead, Rowland R Kao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anthony J WoodRoslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9973-8205
Anne Marie MacKintoshInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Martine SteadInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Rowland R KaoRoslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. rowland.kao@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0919-6401

Funding

RCUK | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) ES/W001489/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination is a critical tool for controlling infectious diseases, with its use to protect against COVID-19 being a prime example. Where a disease is highly transmissible, even a small proportion of unprotected individuals can have substantial implications for disease burden and control. As factors such as deprivation and ethnicity have been shown to influence uptake rates, identifying how uptake varies with socio-demographic indicators is critical for reducing hesitancy and issues of access and identifying plausible future uptake patterns.

methodsWe analyse COVID-19 booster vaccinations in Scotland, subdivided by age, sex, dose and location. Linking to public demographic data, we use Random Forests to fit patterns in first booster uptake, with systematic variation restricted to  ~ 1km in urban areas. We introduce a method to predict future distributions using our first booster model, assuming existing trends over deprivation will persist. This provides a quantitative estimate of the impact of changing motivations and efforts to increase uptake.

resultsWhile age and sex have the greatest impact on the model fit, there is a substantial influence of community deprivation and the proportion of residents belonging to a black or minority ethnicity. Differences between first and second boosters suggest in the longer-term that the impact of deprivation is likely to increase.

conclusionsThis would further the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on deprived communities. Our methods are based solely on public demographic data and routinely recorded vaccination data, and would be easily adaptable to other countries and vaccination campaigns where data recording is similar.

Identifiers

PMID40596654
PMCPMC12215375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.