ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Long-term spatial patterns in COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in socio-demographic disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake by vaccine dose and time after the introduction of COVID-19 vaccination in Israel: epidemiological and policy analysis study.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Article
- Long-term spatial patterns in COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing the importance of demographic risk factors across two waves of SARS-CoV-2 using fine-scale case data.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Empirical distributions of time intervals between COVID-19 cases and more severe outcomes in Scotland.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVaccination is a critical tool for controlling infectious diseases, with its use to protect against COVID-19 being a prime example. Where a disease is highly transmissible, even a small proportion of unprotected individuals can have substantial implications for disease burden and control. As factors such as deprivation and ethnicity have been shown to influence uptake rates, identifying how uptake varies with socio-demographic indicators is critical for reducing hesitancy and issues of access and identifying plausible future uptake patterns.
methodsWe analyse COVID-19 booster vaccinations in Scotland, subdivided by age, sex, dose and location. Linking to public demographic data, we use Random Forests to fit patterns in first booster uptake, with systematic variation restricted to ~ 1km in urban areas. We introduce a method to predict future distributions using our first booster model, assuming existing trends over deprivation will persist. This provides a quantitative estimate of the impact of changing motivations and efforts to increase uptake.
resultsWhile age and sex have the greatest impact on the model fit, there is a substantial influence of community deprivation and the proportion of residents belonging to a black or minority ethnicity. Differences between first and second boosters suggest in the longer-term that the impact of deprivation is likely to increase.
conclusionsThis would further the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on deprived communities. Our methods are based solely on public demographic data and routinely recorded vaccination data, and would be easily adaptable to other countries and vaccination campaigns where data recording is similar.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.