ArticleScientific reports2025
Quantitative ultrasound classification of healthy and chemically degraded ex-vivo cartilage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in cartilage imaging techniques.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we explore the potential of ten quantitative (radiofrequency-based) ultrasound parameters to assess the progressive loss of collagen and proteoglycans, mimicking an osteoarthritis condition in ex-vivo bovine cartilage samples. Most analyzed metrics showed significant changes as the degradation progressed, especially with collagenase treatment. We propose for the first time a combination of these ultrasound parameters through machine learning models aimed at automatically identifying healthy and degraded cartilage samples. The random forest model showed good performance in distinguishing healthy cartilage from trypsin-treated samples, with an accuracy of 60%. The support vector machine demonstrated excellent accuracy (96%) in differentiating healthy cartilage from collagenase-degraded samples. Histological and mechanical analyses further confirmed these findings, with collagenase having a more pronounced impact on both mechanical and histological properties, compared to trypsin. These metrics were obtained using an ultrasound probe having a transmission frequency of 15 MHz, typically used for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal diseases, enabling a fully non-invasive procedure without requiring arthroscopic probes. As a perspective, the proposed quantitative ultrasound assessment has the potential to become a new standard for monitoring cartilage health, enabling the early detection of cartilage pathologies and timely interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.