ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of sandstone microtomographic image segmentation using advanced convolutional neural networks with pixelwise and physical accuracy evaluation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A hybrid deep boosting framework with adaptive label stabilization for SEM-based porosity estimation in fly-ash cement mortar.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of deep learning techniques has revolutionized the automated segmentation of digital rock images. These methods enable precise evaluations of critical properties such as porosity and fluid flow characteristics, thereby enhancing the efficiency of reservoir characterization. This study explores the application of state-of-the-art Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures for analyzing rock micro-CT images, aiming to enhance reservoir characterization efficiency. Specifically, we implement various deep learning models, including Fully Convolutional Networks, Encoder-Decoder Models, Multi-Scale Networks, Dilated Convolution Models, and Attention-Based Models. The segmentation performance of these CNN architectures is benchmarked against the traditional Otsu thresholding method using a dataset of 5,000 2D slices of ten distinct sandstone types, each with a voxel resolution of 2.25 × 2.25 × 2.25 µm. Our evaluation utilizes pixel-wise accuracy metrics such as F1-score, binary-IOU, Recall, and Precision. To replicate the physics of pore-scale fluid movement, various numerical simulation methods such as the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM), Pore Network Modeling (PNM), and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) are employed to predict the permeability and rock formation factor of a blind sample, using CNNs for image segmentation. Our findings reveal that advanced CNNs significantly outperform the Otsu method in both pixel-wise segmentation accuracy and fluid flow simulation performance. Among all CNNs, EfficientNetB0-Unet, VGG16-Unet, and Enet exhibit exceptional performance in segmenting complex pore structures, as evidenced by their high F1-scores and binary-IOU metrics as well as accurate predictions of porosity, permeability, and formation factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.