Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596588›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of sandstone microtomographic image segmentation using advanced convolutional neural networks with pixelwise and physical accuracy evaluation.

Mazaher Hayatdavoudi, Mohammad Emami Niri, Ahmad Kalhor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mazaher HayatdavoudiInstitute of Petroleum Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Emami NiriInstitute of Petroleum Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. emami.m@ut.ac.ir.
Ahmad KalhorSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of deep learning techniques has revolutionized the automated segmentation of digital rock images. These methods enable precise evaluations of critical properties such as porosity and fluid flow characteristics, thereby enhancing the efficiency of reservoir characterization. This study explores the application of state-of-the-art Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures for analyzing rock micro-CT images, aiming to enhance reservoir characterization efficiency. Specifically, we implement various deep learning models, including Fully Convolutional Networks, Encoder-Decoder Models, Multi-Scale Networks, Dilated Convolution Models, and Attention-Based Models. The segmentation performance of these CNN architectures is benchmarked against the traditional Otsu thresholding method using a dataset of 5,000 2D slices of ten distinct sandstone types, each with a voxel resolution of 2.25 × 2.25 × 2.25 µm. Our evaluation utilizes pixel-wise accuracy metrics such as F1-score, binary-IOU, Recall, and Precision. To replicate the physics of pore-scale fluid movement, various numerical simulation methods such as the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM), Pore Network Modeling (PNM), and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) are employed to predict the permeability and rock formation factor of a blind sample, using CNNs for image segmentation. Our findings reveal that advanced CNNs significantly outperform the Otsu method in both pixel-wise segmentation accuracy and fluid flow simulation performance. Among all CNNs, EfficientNetB0-Unet, VGG16-Unet, and Enet exhibit exceptional performance in segmenting complex pore structures, as evidenced by their high F1-scores and binary-IOU metrics as well as accurate predictions of porosity, permeability, and formation factor.

Indexed as

Computational fluid dynamicsConvolution neural networkDigital rock physicsLattice Boltzmann methodPore network modelingRock micro-CT image segmentation

Identifiers

PMID40596588
PMCPMC12218276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.