ArticleScientific reports2025
The audiological phenotype of patients with a variant in MYH9 and MYH14 genes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auditory genotype-phenotype correlation of patients with variants in STRC.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Effect of a Third In-Ear Microphone on User Satisfaction, Speech Intelligibility, and the Real-Ear Gain of Hearing Aids at a Conversational Level in Patients with Moderate Hearing Loss.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mutations in MYH9 and MYH14 are associated with autosomal dominant, progressive sensorineural hearing loss. This study aimed to characterize and compare the clinical and audiological features of patients with MYH9 or MYH14 variants. Thirteen patients with MYH9 or MYH14 mutations were identified through whole-exome or targeted sequencing and underwent audiometric evaluations. Both groups exhibited late-onset, high-frequency, progressive hearing loss. The MYH9 group showed a higher proportion of severe-to-profound cases (41.7%) compared to the MYH14 group (14.3%). One MYH14 case presented with congenital hearing loss linked to a nonsense variant (p.Q25*), expanding the phenotypic spectrum of MYH14-related hearing loss. Several novel variants were identified in both genes, all of which were extremely rare and predicted to be deleterious by in silico analyses. Contrary to previous reports, no syndromic features were observed in patients with MYH9 mutations, although one patient had a marginally elevated mean platelet volume. These findings highlight overlapping auditory phenotypes between MYH9 and MYH14 mutations, with particularly marked variability in the genetic and phenotypic features in MYH9. Early genetic diagnosis can aid in prognosis and support individualized management for patients with progressive hearing loss caused by variants in non-muscle myosin genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.