ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting blastocyst yield in IVF cycles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning prediction of live birth after IVF using the morphological uterus sonographic assessment group features of adenomyosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From the Understanding of Maternal Molecules and Mechanisms to Predicting Embryonic Development.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting blastocyst formation poses significant challenges in reproductive medicine and critically influences clinical decision-making regarding extended embryo culture. While previous research has primarily focused on determining whether an IVF cycle can produce at least one blastocyst, less attention has been given to quantifying blastocyst yields. This study aims to develop and validate such a quantitative predictive tool for IVF cycles. We employed three machine learning models-SVM, LightGBM, and XGBoost-which demonstrated comparable performance and outperformed traditional linear regression models (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.