Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596521›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Determination of the oral carcinoma and sarcoma in contrast enhanced CT images using deep convolutional neural networks.

Kritsasith Warin, Wasit Limprasert, Teerawat Paipongna, Sitthi Chaowchuen, Sothana Vicharueang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kritsasith WarinFaculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand. warin@tu.ac.th.
Wasit LimprasertCollege of Interdisciplinary Studies, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand. wasit@tu.ac.th.
Teerawat PaipongnaSakon Nakhon Hospital, Mueang Sakon Nakhon, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand.
Sitthi ChaowchuenUdonthani Cancer Hospital, Muang Udonthani, Udonthani, Thailand.
Sothana VicharueangStoreMesh, Thailand Science Park, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Funding

Thammasat University TUFT 16/2567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral cancer is a hazardous disease and a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The purpose of this study was to develop the deep convolutional neural networks (CNN)-based multiclass classification and object detection models for distinguishing and detection of oral carcinoma and sarcoma in contrast-enhanced CT images. This study included 3,259 slices of CT images of oral cancer cases from the cancer hospital and two regional hospitals from 2016 to 2020. Multiclass classification models were constructed using DenseNet-169, ResNet-50, EfficientNet-B0, ConvNeXt-Base, and ViT-Base-Patch16-224 to accurately differentiate between oral carcinoma and sarcoma. Additionally, multiclass object detection models, including Faster R-CNN, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11, were designed to autonomously identify and localize lesions by placing bounding boxes on CT images. Performance evaluation on a test dataset showed that the best classification model achieved an accuracy of 0.97, while the best detection models yielded a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.87. In conclusion, the CNN-based multiclass models have a great promise for accurately determining and distinguishing oral carcinoma and sarcoma in CT imaging, potentially enhancing early detection and informing treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Mouth NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerSarcomaTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID40596521
PMCPMC12216691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.