ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on evaluation method for airflow control effect of long-pressure and short-suction dust removal system in heading faces.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a novel "B" coefficient to quantitatively assess the uniformity of airflow fields in coal mine heading faces equipped with the long-pressure and short-suction dust control system. The research systematically investigates the relationship between the radial-to-axial airflow ratio, the proposed uniformity coefficient, and dust suppression efficiency. The results demonstrate that increasing the radial-to-axial airflow ratio from 0.5 to 1.5 leads to a gradual reduction in airflow field uniformity while significantly enhancing dust removal performance. Specifically, the dust removal efficiency improves by 37.7% at the driver's operating position and by 27.7% at a location 5 m behind the driver. The study reveals a distinct nonlinear relationship between the "B" coefficient and dust control effectiveness, highlighting the critical role of airflow field optimization in dust suppression. These findings validate the practical applicability of the "B" coefficient as an evaluation metric for airflow regulation in long-pressure and short-suction systems. The proposed method offers a scientifically grounded approach for assessing and improving dust control strategies in coal mining operations, addressing a longstanding gap in quantitative airflow field analysis for heading face ventilation systems. The research outcomes provide valuable theoretical guidance and technical references for optimizing dust control parameters in similar mining environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.