ArticleScientific reports2025
Multiscale wavelet attention convolutional network for facial expression recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning techniques, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have been widely recognized as effective tools for facial expression recognition applications. The accuracy of facial expression recognition application requires further enhancement. Main work and effects of this study are as follows: First, the first convolutional layer of CNN is substituted with a Multi-scale Convolutional (MsC) layer, resulting in the proposal of the Multi-scale CNN (MCNN). Experimental results indicate that MCNN achieves an average accuracy improvement of 1.339% over CNN. Second, a wavelet Channel Attention (wCA) mechanism is incorporated after the first pooling layer of CNN, leading to the proposal of the wCA-based CNN (wCA-CNN). Experimental results demonstrate that wCA-CNN achieves an average accuracy improvement of 1.414% over CNN. Third, by substituting the first convolutional layer of the CNN with the MsC layer and incorporating wCA mechanism after the first pooling layer, the wCA-based Multi-scale CNN (wCA-MCNN) is introduced. Experimental results reveal that wCA-MCNN achieves an average accuracy improvement of 2.921% compared to CNN. Fourth, the Residual Network (ResNet18) is selected as a baseline model and improved accordingly. Compared to ResNet18, the accuracy of the proposed MsC-ResNet18, wCA-ResNet18, and MsC-wCA-ResNet18 improved by 0.845%, 0.835%, and 1.810%, respectively. Fifth, all the above proposed methods are evaluated by two datasets: the Facial Expression of Students in Real-Class (FESR) dataset collected from our real classroom and the Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces (KDEF) dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.