ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid XAI-driven deep learning framework for robust GI tract disease diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress of machine learning applications in gastric cancer diagnosis and therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- A hybrid ViT-L/32-MaxViT-L architecture with adaptive gated fusion for multiclass gastrointestinal disease detection and multi-methodFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Based on Visual Explanation in Digestive Endoscopy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The stomach is one of the main digestive organs in the GIT, essential for digestion and nutrient absorption. However, various gastrointestinal diseases, including gastritis, ulcers, and cancer, affect health and quality of life severely. The precise diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) tract diseases is a significant challenge in the field of healthcare, as misclassification leads to late prescriptions and negative consequences for patients. Even with the advancement in machine learning and explainable AI for medical image analysis, existing methods tend to have high false negative rates which compromise critical disease cases. This paper presents a hybrid deep learning based explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach to improve the accuracy of gastrointestinal disorder diagnosis, including stomach diseases, from images acquired endoscopically. Swin Transformer with DCNN (EfficientNet-B3, ResNet-50) is integrated to improve both the accuracy of diagnostics and the interpretability of the model to extract robust features. Stacked machine learning classifiers with meta-loss and XAI techniques (Grad-CAM) are combined to minimize false negatives, which helps in early and accurate medical diagnoses in GI tract disease evaluation. The proposed model successfully achieved an accuracy of 93.79% with a lower misclassification rate, which is effective for gastrointestinal tract disease classification. Class-wise performance metrics, such as precision, recall, and F1-score, show considerable improvements with false-negative rates being reduced. AI-driven GI tract disease diagnosis becomes more accessible for medical professionals through Grad-CAM because it provides visual explanations about model predictions. This study makes the prospect of using a synergistic DL with XAI open for improvement towards early diagnosis with fewer human errors and also guiding doctors handling gastrointestinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.