Trial reportScientific reports2025
A comparative study of GVHD prophylaxis using low dose ATG versus PTCy for PBSCT based on two independent prospective cohorts.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) have shown prophylactic effects on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in multiple phase III studies. We conducted a comparative study of for low dose ATG (thymoglobulin) versus PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis in peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). The ATG (n = 67) and PTCy (n = 40) groups included patients enrolled in multicenter phase II studies (JSCT-ATG15 and JSCT-PTCY19, respectively). The probability of GVHD-free and relapse-free survival at 2 years as the primary endpoint was not significantly different between these two groups (57.9% for ATG vs. 67.8% for PTCy, P = 0.49). Both neutrophil and platelet engraftments were both significantly shorter in the ATG group than in the PTCy group (neutrophils: median 13 days vs. 15 days, P = 0.007; platelets: median 20 days vs. 27 days, P = 0.007). The cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD, relapse, non-relapse mortality, and off-immunosuppressant use were similar between these two groups. The probabilities of overall and progression-free survival were 83.4% and 70.0% in the ATG group and 76.5% and 75.2% in the PTCy group, respectively, with no significant differences. These data indicate that low dose ATG and PTCy are equivalent for GVHD prophylaxis for PBSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.