ArticleScientific reports2025
Mendelian randomization study reveals causal association between skin microbiome and skin cancers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbiome in Gastrointestinal Tumors: Implications in Oncogenesis and Therapeutic Response : Microbiome in Gastrointestinal Tumors.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing evidence indicates a link between the skin microbiome and different types of skin cancer, but it is still uncertain if this connection is causal. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between genetically predicted skin microbiome and skin cancer, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), cutaneous melanoma (CM), and actinic keratosis (AK). A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted using summary datasets of public genome-wide association study (GWAS) statistics. Multiple methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and robust adjusted profile score (RAPS), were applied. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results, and a reverse MR analysis was conducted to evaluate potential reverse causality. A total of 1224 SNPs were selected as instrumental variables (IVs) for 78 genus-level skin microbes. Six genus-level skin microbes exhibited suggestive associations with skin cancer. Sensitivity and horizontal pleiotropy analyses confirmed the robustness of these relationships. Reverse MR analysis showed no evidence of reverse causality between the identified skin microbiota taxa and skin cancers. This study identifies potential causal relationships between skin microbiota and four skin cancers. Additional studies are needed to confirm these results and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.