ArticleScientific reports2025
Changes in retinal vascular geometry after vitrectomy in idiopathic and uveitic epiretinal membrane.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epiretinal membrane (ERM) can arise idiopathically or secondary to uveitis, each driven by distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Because ERMs exert tractional forces that distort both the retina and its vasculature, vascular geometry can serve as an indirect marker of the tractional forces acting on the retina. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between postoperative changes in retinal vascular geometry and functional outcomes in patients with idiopathic and uveitic epiretinal membrane (iERM and uERM). A retrospective analysis was performed on 72 eyes (42 iERM, 30 uERM) that underwent pars plana vitrectomy for ERM. Retinal vascular geometric parameters, including arterial and venous angles, branching angles, and tortuosity, were quantitatively measured using conventional retinal fundus photographs. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) were measured preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the comparison of postoperative changes in retinal vascular geometry between iERM and uERM, while the secondary outcome assessed improvements in BCVA, M-score, and CFT, and their correlation with vascular changes. Greater postoperative changes in arterial angle were significantly associated with improvements in BCVA and CFT. The iERM group exhibited more pronounced changes in retinal vascular geometry than the uERM group, particularly in branching venous angles and venous tortuosity. These differences became more evident over time. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that postoperative changes in retinal vascular geometry differ between patients with iERM and uERM, with more significant changes observed in iERM. These findings provide valuable insight into the distinct recovery mechanisms in iERM and uERM, emphasizing the roles of tractional forces and inflammation in shaping postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.