ArticleNature genetics2025
Clonal evolution of hematopoietic stem cells after autologous stem cell transplantation.
Article in Nature genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clonal haematopoiesis and cardiovascular disease, defining risk, filling gaps, and framing the future.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
- Immunological consequences of chemotherapy: implications for cancer immunotherapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Clonal hematopoiesis in patients with cancer and cancer survivors: From clonal burden to cardiovascular diseases.Cancer · 2026Review
- Flare of clonal hematopoiesis, TP53 expansion and prior melphalan drive post-CAR-T myeloid disorders in multiple myeloma.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Somatic mutations and clonal evolution in normal tissues and cancer development.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Modeling the evolutionary dynamics of clonal hematopoiesis.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Dynamics of clonal hematopoiesis and cellular responses to stress-induced toxicity in autologous stem cell transplantation.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Outcomes of therapy-related non-core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia with venetoclax-based therapies.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- The therapy-conditioned host: a state-transition framework for second primary cancer evolution.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Decoding the tumor-aging axis: from bench to clinical.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- CAR19 therapy drives expansion of clonal hematopoiesis and associated cytopenias.Research square · 2025Article
- How chemotherapy shapes hematopoietic stem cells.Nature genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The impact of exogenous stressors, such as cancer chemotherapies, on the genomic integrity and clonal dynamics of normal hematopoiesis is not well defined. We conducted whole-genome sequencing on 1,276 single-cell-derived hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) colonies from ten patients with multiple myeloma treated with chemotherapies and six normal donors. Melphalan treatment significantly increased the mutational burden, producing a distinctive mutation signature, whereas other chemotherapeutic agents had minimal effects. Consequently, the clonal diversity and architecture of post-treatment HSPCs resemble those observed in normal elderly individuals, particularly through the progression of oligoclonal hematopoiesis, thereby suggesting that chemotherapy accelerates clonal aging. Integrated phylogenetic analysis of matched therapy-related myeloid neoplasm samples traced their clonal origin to a single-HSPC clone among multiple competing clones, supporting a model of oligoclonal to monoclonal transformation. These findings underscore the need for further systematic research on the long-term hematological consequences of cancer chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.