ArticleScientific reports2025
Data-driven prediction of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in a nationwide study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the importance of the prevention and premanagement of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases continues to emerge, research is being conducted globally to create and compare risk factor prediction models using health examination big data. In this study, health insurance data were used to predict the incidence of cardiocerebrovascular disease using various models and compare the performance of the models on samples with different initial risk levels. This study analyzed data from 410,859 individuals from the National Health Insurance Service between 2002 and 2019. This study deployed various linear models to predict the occurrence of cardiocerebrovascular diseases in two distinct samples. Models based on logistic regression analysis with penalty terms on the objective function were used, and their predictive performances were compared using multiple evaluation metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The logistic regression model incorporating variables selected by the LASSO algorithm exhibited superior predictive performance relative to other models, although the differences were not statistically significant. The models demonstrated improved performance for samples with higher incidence rates and initial risk levels. This study predicted and compared the incidence of cardiocerebrovascular disease (CCVD) in patients with different health conditions using national sample cohort data from the National Health Insurance Service. The findings underscore the importance of developing diverse models to predict diseases like CCVD, which have high medical costs and incidence rates, thus informing the development of healthcare policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.