ArticleScientific reports2025
A machine learning-based framework for predicting metabolic syndrome using serum liver function tests and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low miR-223 links to major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in end-stage renal disease through endothelial damage.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Quantifying Metabolic Syndrome Severity: Methodological Evolution, Clinical Validation, and Translational Perspectives.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) comprises a clustering of conditions that significantly increase the risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. Timely detection and intervention are crucial in preventing severe health outcomes. In this study, we implemented a machine learning (ML)-based predictive framework to identify MetS using serum liver function tests-Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Direct Bilirubin (BIL.D), Total Bilirubin (BIL.T)-and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). The framework integrated diverse ML algorithms, including Linear Regression (LR), Decision Trees (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Balanced Bagging (BG), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). This framework is designed to develop a robust, scalable, and efficient predictive tool. We evaluated our approach on a large-scale cohort comprising 9,704 participants from the Mashhad Stroke and Heart Atherosclerotic Disorder (MASHAD) study, spanning 2010-2020. After preprocessing, a final dataset of 8,972 individuals (3,442 with MetS and 5,530 without) was used for model development and validation. Among the tested models, GB and CNN demonstrated superior performance, achieving specificity rates of 77% and 83%, respectively. The Gradient Boosting model achieved the lowest error rate of 27%, indicating robust predictive capability. Additionally, SHAP analysis identified hs-CRP, BIL.D, ALT, and sex as the most influential predictors of MetS. These findings suggest that leveraging liver function biomarkers and hs-CRP within an automated ML pipeline can facilitate early, non-invasive detection of MetS, supporting clinical decision-making and risk stratification efforts in healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.