ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a prognostic risk stratification model for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis and its implications in guiding treatment decisions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain metastasis occurs in approximately 50% of patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Despite improved prognosis, survival remains limited. This study aims to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) patients and their prognostic associations, to identify personalized treatment strategies to enhance survival. This retrospective study included HER2-positive BCBM patients treated at three institutions: the Fifth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Peking University First Hospital, and the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. Clinical, pathological, and treatment data were collected. A prognostic model was developed using recursive variable selection, starting with significant variables from univariate analysis and refining them through a recursive loop in multivariate Cox regression. The model stratified patients into three risk groups: low-risk (score 0-1), intermediate-risk (score 2-3), and high-risk (score 4-6), based on various independent prognostic factors. The median survival times for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 30, 20, and 10 months, respectively (P < 0.0001, HR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.