ArticleScientific reports2025
Channa argus optimizer for solving numerical optimization and engineering problems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DMARS_WGO: a deep reinforcement-driven hybrid metaheuristic for intelligent adaptive optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cauchy distribution optimizer for photovoltaic model parameter extraction and numerical optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An Economic Scheduling Management Method for Microgrids Using Multi-Strategy Improved Sand Cat Swarm Optimization.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we introduce the Channa Argus Optimizer (CAO), a novel swarm-based meta-heuristic algorithm that draws inspiration from the distinctive hunting and escaping behavior observed in Channa Arguses in the natural world. The CAO algorithm mainly emulates the hunting and escaping behavior of Chinna Argus to realize a tradeoff between exploitation and exploration in the solution space and discourage premature convergence. The competitiveness and effectiveness of CAO are validated utilizing 29 typical CEC2017 and 10 CEC2020 unconstrained benchmarks and 5 real-world constrained optimization mechanical engineering issues. The CAO algorithm was tested on CEC2017 and CEC2020 functions and compared with 7 algorithms to evaluate performance. In addition, the CAO algorithm is tested on the CEC2017 benchmark functions with dimensions of 10-D, 30-D, 50-D, and 100-D. It is then compared and evaluated against other algorithms, using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Friedman mean rank. Finally, the CAO algorithm is utilized to tackle five intricate engineering problems to show its robustness. These results have demonstrated the effectiveness and potential of the CAO algorithm, yielding outstanding results and ranking first among other algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.