ArticleScientific reports2025
Mamba-fusion for privacy-preserving disease prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive Multimodal Fusion in Vertical Federated Learning for Decentralized Glaucoma Screening.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate disease prediction is essential for improving patient outcomes. Privacy regulations like GDPR and HIPAA limit data sharing, hindering the development of robust predictive models across institutions. FL and multi-modal fusion frameworks counter these problems but are restricted in scalability, inter-client communication, and heterogeneity of data modalities. Techniques which provide privacy on data have an issue whereby they cause a reduction in performance or are computationally costly. This paper presents Mamba-Fusion for Disease prediction, a privacy-preserving framework for multi-modal data. It uses a hierarchical FL architecture to minimize the communication costs and improve the architecture's scalability solution and a Mixture of Experts (MoE) with LSTM based layers for dynamic temporal integration. The latest techniques like, differential privacy, secure aggregation protect both the data and its accuracy of the data as well. Experimental results on multi-modal clinical measurements, ECG, EEG, clinical notes, and demographic data support the applied framework. We have then used Mamba-Fusion to achieve 92:4% accuracy, 0:91 F-Score, and 0:96 AUC-ROC by keeping the privacy leakage at 0:02 and communication costs to 12:5 MB, which make it superior to conventional FL techniques. These results affirm Mamba-Fusion as an applications that are secure enough to support collaborative healthcare analytics on a large scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.