Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596404›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mamba-fusion for privacy-preserving disease prediction.

Muhammad Kashif Jabbar, Huang Jianjun, Ayesha Jabbar, Anas Bilal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Kashif JabbarGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Huang JianjunGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China. huangjin@szu.edu.cn.
Ayesha JabbarGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Anas BilalCollege of Information Science and Technology, Hainan Normal University, Street, Haikou, 571158, China.

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory 2023B1212060076Shenzhen Science and Technology Program JCYJ20220818100004008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate disease prediction is essential for improving patient outcomes. Privacy regulations like GDPR and HIPAA limit data sharing, hindering the development of robust predictive models across institutions. FL and multi-modal fusion frameworks counter these problems but are restricted in scalability, inter-client communication, and heterogeneity of data modalities. Techniques which provide privacy on data have an issue whereby they cause a reduction in performance or are computationally costly. This paper presents Mamba-Fusion for Disease prediction, a privacy-preserving framework for multi-modal data. It uses a hierarchical FL architecture to minimize the communication costs and improve the architecture's scalability solution and a Mixture of Experts (MoE) with LSTM based layers for dynamic temporal integration. The latest techniques like, differential privacy, secure aggregation protect both the data and its accuracy of the data as well. Experimental results on multi-modal clinical measurements, ECG, EEG, clinical notes, and demographic data support the applied framework. We have then used Mamba-Fusion to achieve 92:4% accuracy, 0:91 F-Score, and 0:96 AUC-ROC by keeping the privacy leakage at 0:02 and communication costs to 12:5 MB, which make it superior to conventional FL techniques. These results affirm Mamba-Fusion as an applications that are secure enough to support collaborative healthcare analytics on a large scale.

Indexed as

PrivacyAlgorithmsHumansChronic disease predictionDifferential privacy in healthcareHierarchical aggregation mechanismMulti-modal data fusionPrivacy-preserving federated learningScalable healthcare analytics

Identifiers

PMID40596404
PMCPMC12215979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.