ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and evaluation of an automated classification and counting system for rice planthoppers captured on survey boards.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rice planthoppers are the most economically important insect pests of rice in Asia. Traditional surveys to examine their abundance and composition in paddy fields involve human visual inspection, which requires considerable time and effort by expert entomologists. We previously developed a deep learning-based object detection system which can detect rice planthopper individuals from scanned images of survey boards, categorize, and count planthopper individuals by 18 categories, based on species, developmental stages, adult sexes, and adult wing-forms, with a mean average precision (mAP) of 79%. In this study, we modified the system by reconsidering the categories of planthopper individuals to be counted and by additional supervised training. The modified system can count rice planthopper individuals captured on survey boards across 17 categories with a mAP of 91%. We also showed that by using the system developed here, classification and counting of rice planthopper individuals can be completed in approximately six minutes per survey board, which can take more than an hour for human experts. Thus, this high-performance system can greatly save time and reduce labor costs for monitoring the occurrence, reproduction, and population growth of the rice planthoppers in paddy fields, which could increase the efficiency of their management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.