ArticleScientific reports2025
Bioinformatics analysis and preliminary validation of autophagy-related genes in asthma disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CPA3 drives the development of asthma by promoting the activation of the JAK/STAT6 pathway.Respiratory research · 2025Article
- Crosstalk Between Allergic Inflammation and Autophagy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies have suggested that autophagy may be involved in the development of asthma disease. However, the mechanisms involved have not been fully elucidated. We aimed to identify and validate potential autophagy-related genes in asthma through bioinformatics analysis and experimental verification. Autophagy-related differentially expressed genes were analyzed by protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis, subject operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, construction of relevant microRNAs (miRNAs), transcription factors (TFs), and drug interaction networks and immune infiltration analysis. Finally, validation was performed by western blotting (WB) and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Five hub genes were identified by PPI network analysis and key module construction. These genes showed good diagnostic value for asthma. We also predicted 34 associated miRNAs and 8 associated TFs as well as 10 predictive drugs. The abundance of immune cells, such as memory B cells, naïve CD4 + T cells, follicular helper T cells and gamma delta T cells, was higher compared with the control group. WB and qRT-PCR results showed that the expression levels of TP53, SQSTM1/p62 and ATG5 in the asthma group and healthy control group were consistent with the bioinformatics analysis of the mRNA microarrays, and the dexamethasone (Dex) treatment group was able to inhibit autophagy of cells and affect the expression levels of TP53, SQSTM1/p62 and ATG5 in the lung tissue of asthmatic mice. The present study provides a new insight that autophagy dysregulation exists in asthma and may be involved in the etiology of asthma by participating in multiple pathways and biological functions. Autophagy-related genes in asthma may be valuable biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis, and they may be developed as clinical therapeutic targets in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.