ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep learning-based computed tomography reading system for the diagnosis of lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of commercial AI systems versus participating radiologists for pulmonary nodule detection in routine clinical practice.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces in the perioperative immunotherapy era: radiologic and pathologic pitfalls, surgical extent, and management implications.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- LungDxFormer: a transformer-CNN hybrid model with dynamic spatial attention for accurate lung cancer detection and classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CNN-RNN framework for lung cancer classification using CT imaging and GAN-based augmentation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To propose a deep learning model and explore its performance in the auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces (LCCA) in computed tomography (CT) images. This study is a retrospective analysis that incorporated a total of 342 CT series, comprising 272 series from patients diagnosed with LCCA and 70 series from patients with pulmonary bulla. A deep learning model named LungSSFNet, developed based on nnUnet, was utilized for image recognition and segmentation by experienced thoracic surgeons. The dataset was divided into a training set (245 series), a validation set (62 series), and a test set (35 series). The performance of LungSSFNet was compared with other models such as UNet, M2Snet, TANet, MADGNet, and nnUnet to evaluate its effectiveness in recognizing and segmenting LCCA and pulmonary bulla. LungSSFNet achieved an intersection over union of 81.05% and a Dice similarity coefficient of 75.15% for LCCA, and 93.03% and 92.04% for pulmonary bulla, respectively. These outcomes demonstrate that LungSSFNet outperformed many existing models in segmentation tasks. Additionally, it attained an accuracy of 96.77%, a precision of 100%, and a sensitivity of 96.15%. LungSSFNet, a new deep-learning model, substantially improved the diagnosis of early-stage LCCA and is potentially valuable for auxiliary clinical decision-making. Our LungSSFNet code is available at https://github.com/zx0412/LungSSFNet .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.