Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596353›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Acoustic impedance inversion via voting stacked regression (VStaR) algorithms.

Lutfi Mulyadi Surachman, Sanlin I Kaka, Abdullatif Al-Shuhail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lutfi Mulyadi SurachmanGeoscience Department, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geoscience, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. g201408060@kfupm.edu.sa.
Sanlin I KakaGeoscience Department, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geoscience, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullatif Al-ShuhailGeoscience Department, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geoscience, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we focused on improving acoustic impedance (AI) in seismic exploration. AI is a crucial parameter estimated by multiplying the density of a material by the velocity of an acoustic wave passing through it. A low AI in sandstones and carbonates often indicates high porosity, which enhances hydrocarbon accumulation. Accurate AI estimation is thus critical for reliable hydrocarbon exploration. To refine the AI estimation, we used stacking and voting regression algorithms, with depth, two-way travel time (TWTT), and nine seismic attributes as inputs. All models were implemented using scikit-learn . The VStaR model achieved superior predictive performance ([Formula: see text]= 0.9973) and yielded a more accurate fitting parameter (a = 0.1584) in the acoustic impedance-porosity transformation compared to the VSR ([Formula: see text]= 0.9775, a = 0.1583). The VSR approach made the voting of a top-performing base model with two less predictive base models, as used in the existing literature. Relative to the true and BLIMP-derived impedance, the fitting accuracy followed the order of true > VStaR > VSR > BLIMP. While VStaR required longer computation time (≈ 400 s), it reduced RMSE by 14.74% compared to the top-performing base model. VStaR outperformed all evaluated models based on MSE, RMSE, and [Formula: see text] metrics. The novelty of the VStaR method based on hyperparameters lies in its superior performance in obtaining a more precise prediction of acoustic impedance compared to the VSR and conventional BLIMP method, potentially improving the effectiveness of hydrocarbon exploration in Illam carbonate dataset.

Indexed as

3-fold cross-validationAcoustic impedanceBase ModelsFinal estimatorsHydrocarbon explorationMachine learningSeismic attributesStacking regressionVoting regression

Identifiers

PMID40596353
PMCPMC12217786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.