ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of gaps in direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) management in an outpatient underserved clinic: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Healthcare in the United States: politics, policy, and potential global impact.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DOACs are widely used for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and treatment of thromboembolism, but gaps in their management can lead to adverse outcomes. In outpatient, underserved clinics, challenges such as inappropriate dosing, lack of monitoring, and improper drug combinations may be more pronounced, necessitating evaluation to optimize patient care and reduce risks. This study assessed the appropriateness of DOAC use and dosing per FDA guidelines, considering renal function, hepatic function, and drug-drug interactions. Secondary objectives focused on evaluating inappropriate aspirin use alongside DOACs. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. The study was conducted at Texas A&M Health Family Care Clinic (12/24/2022-12/24/2023). Older than 18 years of age and had active prescription of DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban). A total of 125 DOAC patients were included. Inappropriate dosing based on renal function occurred in 16% of cases. DOAC use was unsuitable in two patients with severe hepatic impairment. Major drug interactions resulted in two instances of inappropriate DOAC use. Additionally, about 61% of aspirin usage involved inappropriate combinations with DOACs, as shown in Fig. 1. The study's findings indicate that anticoagulation management in our ambulatory care setting has the potential for further optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.