ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based model for behavioural analysis in rodents applied to the forced swim test.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- From Monoamines to Systems Psychiatry: Rewiring Depression Science and Care (1960s-2025).Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based model for behavioural analysis in rodents applied to the forced swim test.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Forced Swim Test (FST) is a widely used preclinical model for assessing antidepressant efficacy, studying stress response, and evaluating depressive-like behaviours in rodents. Over the last 10 years, more than 5500 scientific articles reporting the use of the FST have been published. Despite its widespread use, the FST behaviours are still manually scored, resulting in a labor-intensive and time-consuming process that is prone to human bias and variability. Despite eliminating some biases, existing automated systems are costly and typically only able to distinguish between immobility and active behaviours. Therefore, they are often unable to accurately differentiate the major subtypes of movement patterns, such as swimming and climbing. To address these limitations, we propose a novel approach based on machine learning (ML) using a three-dimensional residual convolutional neural network (3D RCNN) that processes video pixels directly, capturing the spatiotemporal dynamics of rodent behaviour. Our ML model was validated against manual scoring in rats treated with fluoxetine and desipramine, two antidepressants known to induce distinct behavioural patterns. The ML model successfully differentiated among swimming, climbing, and immobility behaviours, demonstrating its potential as a standardized and unbiased tool for automatized behavioural analysis in the FST. Subsequently, we successfully validated our model by testing its ability to distinguish between drugs that predominantly evoke climbing (i.e., amitriptyline), those that preferentially facilitate swimming (i.e., paroxetine), and those that evoke both in a more balanced manner (i.e., venlafaxine). This approach represents a significant advancement in preclinical research, providing a more accurate and efficient method to analyze forced swimming data in rodents. We anticipate that in addition to the FST, our model and approach could be extended for application to various behavioural tests in laboratory animals, by training with specific datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.