ArticleScientific reports2025
Park use patterns and park satisfaction before and after citywide park renovations in low-income New York City neighborhoods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term impacts of co-designed sustainable park improvements on physical activity and other wellbeing behaviours: a 7-year natural experimental study in a deprived urban area.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Article
- Contributions of park-based activities to overall physical activity among adults living near recently renovated parks in low-income New York City neighborhoods: variations by race/ethnicity and sex.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban parks may promote health through physical activity, stress management, and social connectedness. However, poor-quality parks in disrepair are underutilized, limiting these benefits. This study evaluated the impact of a citywide park renovation program known as the Community Parks Initiative (CPI) on changes in park use patterns and park satisfaction among residents living in low-income New York City neighborhoods. Repeated cross-sectional surveys were administered to residents living near 31 parks undergoing CPI renovations (545 pre-renovation and 201 post-renovation respondents) and near 21 parks in socio-demographically matched control neighborhoods (345 pre-renovation and 129 post-renovation respondents). Surveys measured self-reported past-month park visits, typical park visit duration, and satisfaction with park quality and facilities. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) approach, generalized estimating equations were fit to compare changes over time in park use and satisfaction among residents living near parks receiving renovations compared to those living near control parks. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, income, public housing, marital status, and children in household. Residents in neighborhoods receiving park renovations reported a larger increase in minutes spent at the park on weekdays [DID = 30.0 min (95% CI 10.3, 49.7)] and total minutes spent at the park in the last 30 days [DID = 466.3 min (95% CI 63.0, 869.6)] compared to controls. Residents of renovated park neighborhoods also reported larger increases in park satisfaction relative to residents of control neighborhoods, with the largest improvements in the percent of residents satisfied with overall park quality [DID = 38.4% (95% CI 25.2, 51.6)] and maintenance of grounds and facilities [DID = 40.9% (95% CI 27.7, 54.1)]. This study provides evidence that park renovations are an important urban planning strategy to support community health through increased park use and improved park perceptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.