Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596310›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessing predation of monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) larvae using artificial caterpillar models.

Adam M Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adam M BakerDavey Institute, 1500 N. Mantua St., 44240, Kent, OH, USA. adam.baker@davey.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predation of immature monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) by arthropod natural enemies is well-established. However, little is known about predation by avian and mammalian predators on this species. Decline of the monarch over the last several decades has led to numerous conservation programs and efforts to plant milkweed and floral resources in diverse habitats. The recent proposal to list the monarch as a threatened species may require non-lethal methods for studying predation dynamics. Here, artificial caterpillar models were used to assess predation of late instar monarchs in urban, peri-urban, and rural milkweed stands. Impressions on the larval models left behind by arthropod, avian, and mammalian natural enemies reveal higher instances of predation in rural areas. Predation by arthropods increased from May-late July and diminished in August and September. Avian predation was highest in May-early June, with an uptick in September, and rarely occurred in late July-early August. Mammalian predation was minimal. This study suggests that artificial larva can be used to study predation of a conspicuous species of conservation concern, such as the monarch, although inherent methodological limitations should be considered.

Indexed as

ButterfliesPredatory BehaviorAnimalsBirdsEcosystemLarvaArtificial preyAvianNatural enemies

Identifiers

PMID40596310
PMCPMC12215521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.