Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596287›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A virtual reality game for older adults' immersive learning.

Lee Cheng, Wing Yan Jasman Pang, Anthony Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lee ChengCambridge School of Creative Industries, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK. lee.cheng@aru.ac.uk.
Wing Yan Jasman PangDepartment of Cultural and Creative Arts, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Anthony KongSchool of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a feasibility study that assessed the effectiveness of a virtual reality (VR) game in training older adults' cognitive and independent living skills. A home-like virtual environment, comprising six mini-games, each designed to target a specific type of learning, was created to enhance the gamified experience. A qualitative approach was used to evaluate the feasibility of the gamified approach, involving semi-structured interviews with older adults (N = 30) who had played the VR game. Findings revealed positive feedback on the VR game's effectiveness in facilitating learning among older adults, including ease of use and perceived usefulness which informed their acceptance of the technology, as well as the competency and cognitive developments afforded by the VR game. The gaming experience also offers varying degrees of stimulation and engagement, although some negative experiences, such as cybersickness and anxiety, were identified that may require further attention. The study's findings offer insights into the feasibility of employing digital game-based learning for older adults within an immersive learning environment and provide best practices for designing VR games that promote the development of cognitive and independent living skills.

Indexed as

LearningVideo GamesVirtual RealityAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedAgingCognitive skillsDigital game-based learningImmersive technologyLife skillsSerious game

Identifiers

PMID40596287
PMCPMC12214602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.