Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596283›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Implied object direction from eye location enhances animacy ratings but not detection of chasing behavior.

Takahiro Kawabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Takahiro KawabeNTT Communication Science Laboratories, 3-1, Morinosato Wakamiya, Atsugi, 243-0198, Kanagawa, Japan. takahiro.kawabe@ntt.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how humans perceive animacy in dynamic visual stimuli is fundamental to elucidating the mechanisms underlying visual social cognition. While both object geometry and eye-like features are known to independently influence animacy impressions, their interactive effects remain insufficiently explored. This study investigates how the combination of object geometry and the location of eye-like patterns modulates the perception of animacy in non-living moving objects. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the pointing direction of triangular objects and the location of eye-like features (near the vertex, near the edge, or absent), and found that animacy impressions were enhanced when the direction of motion aligned with the gaze-implied object direction, irrespective of the object's geometrical shape. Experiment 2 examined whether this effect generalizes to an objective task, in which participants identify a target triangle chasing a green disk among distractors. Although the gaze-implied object direction did not significantly influence detection sensitivity, the spatial location of the eye pattern within the triangular shape continued to weakly modulate participants' performance. These findings suggest that cues related to eye location contribute to subjective animacy at multiple stages of cognitive processing, with their impact varying depending on task demands and perceptual context.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultAnimacyEye locationIntentionMotionObject shapeWolfpack effect

Identifiers

PMID40596283
PMCPMC12214860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.