ArticleScientific reports2025
Brief memory reactivations enable generalization of offline visual perceptual learning mechanisms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Advances in perceptual learning: new directions, techniques, and applications.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceptual learning can significantly improve visual sensitivity even in fully matured adults. However, the ability to generalize learning to untrained conditions is often limited. While traditionally, perceptual learning is attributed to practice-dependent plasticity mechanisms, recent studies suggest that brief memory reactivations can efficiently improve visual perception, recruiting higher-level brain regions. Here we provide evidence that similar memory reactivation mechanisms promote generalization of offline learning mechanisms. Human participants encoded a visual discrimination task with the target stimulus at retinotopic location A. Then, brief memory reactivations of only five trials each were performed on separate days at location A. Generalization was tested at retinotopic location B. Results indicate remarkable enhancement of location B performance following memory reactivations, pointing to efficient offline generalization mechanisms. A control experiment with no reactivations showed minimal generalization. These findings suggest that reactivation-induced learning further enhances learning efficiency by promoting offline generalization mechanisms to untrained conditions, and can be further tested in additional learning domains, with potential future clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.