ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and usability evaluation of a mHealth application for prehospital triage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital emergency routing: analysis of feasibility, utilization, and equity implications.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study developed and evaluated a mobile health (mHealth) application for prehospital triage. The effective triage of undifferentiated patients is crucial for appropriate prehospital care and mHealth applications offer potential support by classifying patient conditions prior to hospital arrival. This two-stage applied study, conducted in 2023, began with determining functional requirements through a literature review and a questionnaire-based survey, informed by existing guidelines. A conceptual model was then developed using Microsoft Visio 2021. The application then was developed using Android Studio in Java and Kotlin languages. In the second stage, the application's usability was evaluated by involving 32 paramedics and EMT technicians through using the Mobile Application Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). Key application features included comprehensive information forms, triage level calculation based on the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), hospital navigation, and structured case report generation. Ease of use received the highest score (4.35 ± 0.47), while interface and satisfaction obtained the lowest scored (3.84 ± 0.79). Overall user satisfaction was high (4.12 ± 0.59; Max: 5.00). Results suggest that this mHealth application can effectively support prehospital care by addressing user needs and providing essential functionalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.