ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning for occupation recognition and knowledge discovery in rheumatology clinical notes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Occupational data is a crucial social determinant of health, influencing diagnostic accuracy, treatment strategies, and policy-making in healthcare. However, its inclusion in electronic health records (EHR) is often relegated to unstructured fields. This study aims to assess the collection and use of occupation-related data in rheumatology clinical narratives, describe factors influencing its collection, and analyze its association with patient diagnoses. We employed a pre-trained Spanish language model fine-tuned with biomedical texts to identify occupation mentions in the EHR of 35,586 rheumatic patients. The model's performance was evaluated using a gold-standard dataset with precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. Occupation mentions were normalized using the European Skills, Competences, Qualifications, and Occupations (ESCO) classification. Logistic regression analyses identified sociodemographic and clinical predictors of occupation collection and examined associations between occupations and diagnoses. The model achieved an F1-score of 0.73, identifying valid occupation mentions in 3527 patients (10%). Normalization yielded 402 ESCO codes. Mechanical pathologies such as back pain and muscle disorders were associated with a higher probability of occupation collection, while professions like cleaners and helpers were linked to these conditions. Customer service clerks and hairdressers were associated with autoimmune diseases. This study demonstrates the feasibility of automated occupation recognition in EHRs, highlighting the relevance of occupational data as a social determinant of health in rheumatology. Integrating such data could inform targeted prevention and treatment strategies for rheumatic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.