ArticleScientific reports2025
Contributions of the multiple demand network to emergent and skilled reading.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task load modulates network interactions between bilateral fronto-parietal and cerebellar areas during verbal working memory.iScience · 2026Article
- Established and Emergent Reading Skills in Adults with Cerebellar Stroke: Evidence of Phonological Alexia.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reading is an acquired skill that must engage brain networks initially evolved for other functions, integrating visual, language, and executive systems. However, it is still unclear how evolutionary-defined brain networks are leveraged to scaffold reading skills. Here, we focus on emergent reading in an artificial alphabetic writing system - a process that is heavily based on phonological decoding. We examine whether such emergent reading co-opts portions of the language and multiple demand (MD) networks, and whether it activates constituents of a network associated with skilled reading. Adult participants (n = 32) completed training in the artificial alphabet and ten reading sessions over the course of several weeks. After that, participants' brain activity was recorded with the fMRI as they read words in the new alphabet. We found substantial overlap between regions activated during emergent reading and the MD network, but only minor overlap with the language network. Identified regions also overlapped with the skilled reading network, albeit showing sites of divergence. Furthermore, we observed differences in the relative engagement of the MD and language networks during emergent vs. skilled reading, suggesting that configurations of neural systems change with reading experience, with greater contributions from the language network to more skilled reading processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.