Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596238›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluating the mechanical performance and durability of cement mortars incorporating sesame shells as partial cement and sand replacement.

Ashtar S Al-Luhybi, Taghreed Khaleefa Mohammed Ali, Diyar N Qader, Mujahid Ali, Nelson Maureira-Carsalade, Pablo Fernando Parra, Siva Avudaiappan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashtar S Al-LuhybiDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Taghreed Khaleefa Mohammed AliDepartment of Architecture Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Koya University, Danielle Mitterrand Boulevard, Koya KOY45, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Diyar N QaderCivil Engineering Department, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq. diyar.nasih@uokirkuk.edu.iq.
Mujahid AliDepartment of Transport Systems, Traffic Engineering and Logistics, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Krasinskiego 8 Street, 40-019, Katowice, Poland.
Nelson Maureira-CarsaladeDepartamento de Ingeniería Civil, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción 4090541, Chile.
Pablo Fernando ParraFaculty of Engineering and Sciences, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, 7941169, Chile.
Siva AvudaiappanDepartamento de Ciencias de la Construcción, Facultad de Ciencias de la Construcción y Ordenamiento Territorial, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Santiago, Chile. s.avudaiappan@utem.cl.

Funding

ANID FONDECYT 11240066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the mechanical and durability behaviors of cement mortar containing sesame shells (SS) as partial substitutes of cement and sand with regard to sustainable construction using an agricultural by-product. Three types of SS-raw powder, vinegar-treated powder and vinegar-thermal-treated powder (250 °C)-were used as the fine aggregate replacements at 1%, 2%, and 3% by weight. Mechanical performances (compressive strength, dry density) and durability (UPV, water absorption, water porosity, workability) of the composites were investigated in a systematic manner. Results show that substituting sand with SS causes a significant decrease in the compressive strength (up to 54% at 3%of replacement) and the increase in porosity and water absorption that compromised the durability. On the contrary, the use of SS, particularly the treated one, caused strength decrease (up to 42.3%) with improved durability properties specifically lower porosity (8.84%) and lower water absorption (1.7%). UPV of all mixes were above 4.2 km/s representing good internal consistency. Error bars were included in all test figures with replicate specimens to properly demonstrate the variation and to reinforce the reliability of the data. The findings suggest that the optimal use of SS is as a 3% cement replacement in treated form, offering an environmentally friendly alternative with acceptable mechanical performance and significantly improved durability.

Indexed as

Compressive strengthDry densityPorositySesame shellsUltrasonic velocityWater absorption

Identifiers

PMID40596238
PMCPMC12215421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.