ArticleScientific reports2025
A new approach to foam flooding modelling with novel parameter Estimation techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dry-Out is one of the most critical phenomena in foam flooding, especially in Surfactant-Alternating-Gas. Commercial reservoir simulators are equipped with different Dry-Out models which have two main issues; first, even for the water saturation less than the limiting value, the current models are not able to dry out the foam thoroughly, second, the data from steady-state foam flooding experiments are required to estimate the model parameters. This study aims to address these issues in two separate parts. Firstly, it proposes a modified Dry-Out function to tackle the inadequacies of models in the vicinity of limiting water saturation without any discontinuity. It employs the error function to reveal the foam coalescence and cause the singularity in the current models to disappear. This model is verified with foam flooding experimental data. Secondly, the Genetic Algorithm and Nonlinear Least Square are used to develop the new approaches to estimate the Dry-Out parameters using the steady and unsteady state foam flooding experimental data, respectively. The set of steady and unsteady state foam flooding is conducted to validate the proposed approach for the model's parameters estimation. Eventually, foam flooding is numerically simulated to verify the modified model and parameters estimation approaches. The modified model indicates an acceptable fit with observed data compared with commercial simulators. The novel methodology for obtaining fitting parameters from unsteady state flooding yields precise parameters, thereby obviating the need for time-intensive steady state flooding experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.