ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning strategies for semantic segmentation of pediatric brain tumors in multiparametric MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical two-stage ensemble of dilated U-net models for brain tumor segmentation.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2026Article
- Comparison of brain normalization software and lesion compensation techniques in chronic perinatal stroke imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated segmentation of pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) can support precise diagnosis and treatment monitoring, but it is still poorly investigated in literature. This study proposes two different Deep Learning approaches for semantic segmentation of tumor regions in PBTs from MRI scans. Two pipelines were developed for segmenting enhanced tumor (ET), tumor core (TC), and whole tumor (WT) in pediatric gliomas from the BraTS-PEDs 2024 dataset. First, a pre-trained SegResNet model was retrained with a transfer learning approach and tested on the pediatric cohort. Then, two novel multi-encoder architectures leveraging the attention mechanism were designed and trained from scratch. To enhance the performance on ET regions, an ensemble paradigm and post-processing techniques were implemented. Overall, the 3-encoder model achieved the best performance in terms of Dice Score on TC and WT when trained with Dice Loss and on ET when trained with Generalized Dice Focal Loss. SegResNet showed higher recall on TC and WT, and higher precision on ET. After post-processing, we reached Dice Scores of 0.843, 0.869, 0.757 with the pre-trained model and 0.852, 0.876, 0.764 with the ensemble model for TC, WT and ET, respectively. Both strategies yielded state-of-the-art performances, although the ensemble demonstrated significantly superior results. Segmentation of the ET region was improved after post-processing, which increased test metrics while maintaining the integrity of the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.