ArticleScientific reports2025
Predict the degree of secondary structures of the encoding sequences in DNA storage by deep learning model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A modulation-based encryption framework integrating channel and artificial noise for DNA storage.iScience · 2026Article
- Advances and challenges in non-canonical nucleic acids data storage.Nature communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA storage has been widely considered as a promising alternative for exponentially growing data. However, the inherent complex secondary structures severely compromise the processes of synthesis, PCR amplification, and sequencing, interfering with reliable information recovery. In large-scale storage applications, how to effectively circumvent the negative effects is a critical problem. As secondary structures are formed by contiguous bases with reversal complementary relations and accompanied by the released free energy, we construct a BiLSTM-Transformer model with k-mer embedding to predict the free energy of sequences and further screen out these sequences with high values. K-mer embedding can capture the characteristics of contiguous base pairings through overlapping short subsequences, further facilitating free-energy prediction. Compared with other deep learning models, our simulation results demonstrate that BiLSTM-Transformer model with k-mer embedding has a better prediction performance. Application on a real dataset demonstrates that the proposed model can screen out those top high-risk sequences which are prone to more read errors and fewer retrieved copy numbers in real DNA storage. The proposed screening method for top high-risk sequences can be a proactive step to prevent the occurrence of severe secondary structures, providing a solution for reliable information retrieval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.