Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596190›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Innovative deep learning classifiers for breast cancer detection through hybrid feature extraction techniques.

S Vijayalakshmi, Binay Kumar Pandey, Digvijay Pandey, Mesfin Esayas Lelisho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S VijayalakshmiDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sona College of Technology, Salem, 636005, Tamilnadu, India.
Binay Kumar PandeyDepartment of Information Technology, College of Technology, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.
Digvijay PandeyDepartment of Technical Education Uttar Pradesh, Kanpur, India.
Mesfin Esayas LelishoDepartment of Statistics, College of Natural and Computational Science, Mizan-Tepi University, Tepi, Ethiopia. vijisaumiya@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a major cause of mortality among women, where early and accurate detection is critical to improving survival rates. This study presents a hybrid classification approach for mammogram analysis by combining handcrafted statistical features and deep learning techniques. The methodology involves preprocessing with the Shearlet Transform, segmentation using Improved Otsu thresholding and Canny edge detection, followed by feature extraction through Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), Gray Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM), and 1st-order statistical descriptors. These features are input into a 2D BiLSTM-CNN model designed to learn spatial and sequential patterns in mammogram images. Evaluated on the MIAS dataset, the proposed method achieved 97.14% accuracy, outperforming several benchmark models. The results indicate that this hybrid strategy offers improvements in classification performance and may assist radiologists in more effective breast cancer screening.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMammographyAlgorithmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerDeep learningGray-level run-length matrixGrey level co-occurrenceGrey level difference matrixMachine learningMammogram imagesNakagami distribution parameter

Identifiers

PMID40596190
PMCPMC12219080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.