ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating motion capture technology and intraoral ultrasonography for 3D anatomical analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inherent two-dimensional (2D) nature of ultrasonography (US) limits its accuracy in visualizing complex intraoral structures. This proof-of-concept feasibility study introduces a novel approach integrating motion-capture technology and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction to overcome these limitations and improve anatomical interpretation. Two healthy Korean volunteers underwent real-time 2D B-mode intraoral US (11.5 MHz) targeting the maxillary second molars in the occlusal plane. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3D facial scans were performed with a 2.7-cm-wide mouth opening, and the images were superimposed. A motion-capture camera tracked the US probe to verify the 3D positioning of the US images. The integrated system enabled visualization of complex anatomical structures surrounding the coronoid process with greater spatial context. Comparative analysis between US images, 3D models, and MRI confirmed the feasibility of accurately locating intraoral anatomical features with high reproducibility. This feasibility study demonstrates the utility of motion capture and 3D imaging in enhancing intraoral US. Accurate spatial localization is essential due to the dynamic positioning of adjacent structures affecting the temporomandibular joint. The findings provide foundational data for standardizing future intraoral US methodologies and suggest directions for real-time anatomical analysis and procedural guidance, such as US-guided botulinum toxin injection into the temporalis tendon or preoperative implant site planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.