ArticleScientific reports2025
Relationship between intraocular pressure and pulmonary function.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between intraocular pressure and climate parameters.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the association between respiratory function and intraocular pressure (IOP). We included the Jikei and Japan Ningen Dock Study (JNDS) datasets that included data from 10,361 (50.3 ± 11.0 years) and 283,199 (51.7 ± 10.3 years) participants, respectively. IOP was measured using non-contact tonometry, and respiratory function was assessed using spirometry, focusing on the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio, percent predicted values of FEV1 (ppFEV1), and percent predicted values of FVC (ppFVC). The relationship between respiratory function indices and IOP was assessed using multiple linear regression. The mean IOP was 12.7 ± 2.8 and 13.3 ± 2.9 mmHg in the Jikei and JNDS datasets, respectively, with a significant positive linear correlation between FEV1/FVC and IOP (β = 0.020, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.011 - 0.029, P < 0.001 in the Jikei dataset; β = 0.015, 95% CI: 0.013 - 0.016, P < 0.001 in the JNDS dataset). Compared with healthy individuals, 505 and 2,228 participants with FEV1/FVC < 70% (Jikei dataset) and FEV1/FVC < 60% (JNDS dataset) had lower IOPs of 0.641 (95% CI: 0.286 - 0.996, P < 0.001) mmHg and 0.888 (95% CI: 0.729 - 1.047, P < 0.001) mmHg, respectively. Both ppFEV1 and ppFVC showed no association with IOP. This possible association between obstructive ventilatory disorders and IOP suggests the importance of considering respiratory function in IOP management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.