ArticleScientific reports2025
Intelligent classification and prediction of students' mental health in online learning environments using boosting algorithm and LIWC features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An adaptive attention U-network for recognizing ultrasound images.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- An algorithm for optimizing psychological regulation strategies for college students based on image recognition and reinforcement learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to enhance the accuracy and stability of classifying students' mental health status in online learning environments using an intelligent model built on the Boosting algorithm and LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count) features. The model extracts emotional and psychological features from online learning platforms using the LIWC dictionary and integrates multiple weak classifiers using the Boosting algorithm. The performance of the model is enhanced with the Antlion Optimization Algorithm. Experimental results show that the model's classification accuracy ranges between 98 and 99%, effectively reducing misclassification rates and accurately identifying students experiencing high stress and anxiety. The model enhances mental health status classification and real-time monitoring accuracy, offering critical support for targeted psychological interventions in education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.