ArticleScientific reports2025
Validation of guiding needle placement using registered ultrasound imaging for gynecologic brachytherapy in a simulated pelvic Phantom.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our previous research demonstrated that, under ideal conditions, high-precision image registration between real-time ultrasound (US) images and preoperative CT/MR images could be achieved using real-time US guidance for needle insertion. In this study, we enhanced a constructed phantom to better simulate the structure of human abdominal tissue, aiming to verify the accuracy of surgical needle placement guided by real-time US images registered with preoperative CT/MR images. Specifically, the pelvic phantom was improved using animal abdominal tissue to mimic the properties of human abdominal tissue. In the improved phantom experiments, the target registration error (TRE) for the real-time needle trajectory of four implanted needles in the registered US-CT images was 0.81 ± 0.11 mm (mean ± SD), with an average trajectory angle error of 0.83 ± 0.063 degrees (mean ± SD). For the registered US-MR images, the average registration error was 0.76 ± 0.014 mm (mean ± SD), and the average trajectory angle error was 0.825 ± 0.018 degrees (mean ± SD). These results demonstrate that, even in simulated human tissue, rigid registration between real-time US images and preoperative CT/MR images maintained high accuracy, supporting the feasibility of real-time US-guided needle insertion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.