ArticleScientific reports2025
Relumino mode may provide video terminal assistance for the amblyopic patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess whether Relumino mode TV could assist amblyopic patients using video terminals. This mode utilizes real-time image processing techniques to enhance visual effects. We recruited 38 participants with anisometropic amblyopia, all literate and cognitively capable. The Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) of the normal and Relumino modes was measured to evaluate the relationship between spatial frequency variations and visual effects. All participants underwent tests for visual acuity, reading performance (reading speed and accuracy), and viewing three 5-min videos in both modes. Afterward, they completed a Visual Function Evaluation Questionnaire. A total of 38 volunteers (mean age, 17.0 ± 13.3 years) completed this study. The results indicated that in Relumino mode, the visual scores for static images and videos with lower MTF were 5.58 ± 1.66 (p = 0.038) and 5.33 ± 1.42 (p = 0.167), respectively, suggesting better visual function with Relumino mode, compared to the normal mode. However, no significant changes were found in the LogMAR mean values for amblyopic eyes (from 0.47 ± 0.26 to 0.49 ± 0.26, p = 0.237), reading speed (from 68.62 ± 59.13 to 74.39 ± 59.78, p = 0.209) or reading accuracy (from 0.96 ± 0.12 to 0.92 ± 0.17, p = 0.019) before and after using Relumino mode. There was no significant improvement in visual functions related to text on the screen. This study suggests that the Relumino mode enhances the visual experience for amblyopic patients when watching videos or images on the TV, especially compared to the normal mode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.