Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effects of WeChat-based telehealth on patients reported outcomes of hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of WeChat-based patient-doctor interaction improves patient experience ofFrontiers in digital health · 2026Trial
- The effectiveness of motivational interviewing on self-management in older adults with hypertension and frailty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Global research trends and hotspots in digital health in hypertension: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis (1992-2025).Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are assessments based on patients' self-perception. This study aimed to explore whether WeChat-based health education is more effective than traditional health education in terms of improving PROs for hypertensive patients during a 3-month period. This prospective, single-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted from April to August 2022 at the hypertension ward of Yunnan Province Fuwai Cardiovascular Hospital. A total of 96 patients who were aged 18-75 years and diagnosed with primary hypertension for the first time were recruited. The participants were randomly assigned to either the WeChat health education group or the conventional care group at a 1:1 ratio. The intervention lasted for 3 months, with PRO scales administered at baseline (T0), 1 month postintervention (T1), and 3 months postintervention (T2). The experiment ultimately enrolled 96 people, with a mean age of 41 years for the intervention group and 43 years for the control group. Regarding the main outcomes, the total PRO scores of the WeChat group significantly increased from 79.29 points at baseline to 83.68 points after the interventions (95% CI - 7.373, - 1.400; P < 0.05). Additionally, there were significant intergroup differences at 1 month postintervention (TOT: mean difference in change between groups: 3.95, 95% CI 0.127, 7.766, P < 0.05) and at 3 months postintervention (TOT: mean difference in change between groups: 5.05, 95% CI 1.26, 8.833, P < 0.05). This trial demonstrated that WeChat-based telehealth interventions have a positive effect on PROs. The incorporation of digital health education and telehealth interventions can serve as an adjuvant treatment for hypertensive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.