ArticleScientific reports2025
Ensiling characteristics and in vitro rumen fermentation of Sesbania grandiflora pods prepared with inhibitory and stimulatory additives.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Replacing Alfalfa withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Article
- Enhancing Rehydrated Rice Husk as Ruminant Feed via Silage Additives: An In Vitro Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Limited research has been conducted on the ensiling characteristics of Sesbania grandiflora pods (SGP) for ruminant production. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of silage additives on ensiling characteristics and in vitro rumen fermentation of SGP. A completely randomized design included three treatments: control (untreated), formic acid (FA) at 7.5 mL/kg fresh matter (FM) as an inhibitor, and sugarcane molasses at 50 g/kg FM with Lactobacillus casei TH14 at 1.0 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.