ArticleScientific reports2025
Intermingled representation of oral cavity in mouse trigeminal ganglion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemispherectomy-Based Optical Window for In Vivo Visualization of Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons in Mice.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- A Fluorescence Imaging-Based 3D Analysis Pipeline for Mouse Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons.Biosensors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Somatotopy serves as a fundamental principle underlying sensory information processing, traditionally emphasized in the study of the cerebral cortex. However, little effort has been directed towards unraveling the spatial organization characterizing the earlier stages of somatosensory pathways. In this study, we developed a novel methodology to visualize individual neurons within the trigeminal ganglion-a crucial cluster of cell bodies of sensory neurons innervating the face. Our investigations revealed a reliable sensory response to stimulation of the lower incisor or lip within this ganglion. The responsive neurons were confined to a specific portion of the trigeminal ganglion, consistent with innervation of the lower oral cavity by the mandibular nerve (V3). Contrary to our expectations, we did not observe a discernible map differentiating the lower tooth and the lip. Instead, the spatial representation of the tooth and lip within this portion of trigeminal ganglion exhibited intermingling with no clear border between tooth-responding and lip-responding neurons. These findings contrast with earlier studies that identified tooth and lip responding regions in the somatosensory cortex. Our study sheds light on the complex spatial organization of sensory processing in the trigeminal system, highlighting the need for further research to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and implications for sensory perception and clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.