ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning based on a generative adversarial tri-model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel machine learning paradigm called the generative adversarial tri-model (GAT) to incorporate analytical knowledge into neural networks through a unique positive-sum game strategy. The motivation is to solve the problem that pure machine learning models fail to obey the fundamental governing laws of physics in engineering fields. The GAT method is successfully implemented to solve ODE (ordinary differential equation) problems with various constraints. A strict error bound is proven for initial-constraint problems, which certifies its reliability. The real-world significance of the GAT method is reflected by its application to a human body oscillation recovery problem, based on balance sensor measurements, which is critical for human balancing evaluation, yet unresolved after massive precedent research work. Further human experiment results prove the effectiveness of the GAT method. Both theoretical and experimental studies demonstrate that the GAT method is useful and reliable. It envisions great scalability for wider applications and adaptions prospect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.