ArticleScientific reports2025
Navigating a varying reward environment in childhood and adolescence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histamine shapes the neurocomputational dynamics of human learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimal reward learning requires individuals to adjust their learning rates - the extent to which new information replaces old. Learning rates should be higher in volatile environments, where new information is more salient, and lower in stable environments, where the longer-term history of outcomes is more predictive. It is not known, however, whether this adjustment in learning rates changes with age or is associated with better mental health and social functioning. We administered a child-friendly probabilistic reinforcement learning task with both fixed and fluctuating reward schedules to 121 participants aged 8-16 years. Adjustment of learning rates across childhood and adolescence to suit the levels of uncertainty in the environment did not differ by age, nor was it associated with better mental health and social functioning. Instead we found that learning rates for worse-than-expected outcomes generally decreased with age, temperature increased with age and higher learning rates, specifically during positive stable environments, were associated with greater self-reported prosocial behaviour. Our results highlight the exaggerated impact of negative feedback on children and suggest an increase in exploratory behaviour between childhood and adolescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.