Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595968›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Navigating a varying reward environment in childhood and adolescence.

Louise Neil, Vincent Valton, Essi Viding, Diana Armbruster-Genc, Vivien Vuong, Katy Packer, Molly Sharp, Jonathan P Roiser, Eamon McCrory

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Louise NeilDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Vincent ValtonInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
Essi VidingDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Diana Armbruster-GencDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Vivien VuongDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Katy PackerDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Molly SharpDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Jonathan P Roiser *Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
Eamon McCrory *Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK. e.mccrory@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

NSPCC and ESRC 539220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal reward learning requires individuals to adjust their learning rates - the extent to which new information replaces old. Learning rates should be higher in volatile environments, where new information is more salient, and lower in stable environments, where the longer-term history of outcomes is more predictive. It is not known, however, whether this adjustment in learning rates changes with age or is associated with better mental health and social functioning. We administered a child-friendly probabilistic reinforcement learning task with both fixed and fluctuating reward schedules to 121 participants aged 8-16 years. Adjustment of learning rates across childhood and adolescence to suit the levels of uncertainty in the environment did not differ by age, nor was it associated with better mental health and social functioning. Instead we found that learning rates for worse-than-expected outcomes generally decreased with age, temperature increased with age and higher learning rates, specifically during positive stable environments, were associated with greater self-reported prosocial behaviour. Our results highlight the exaggerated impact of negative feedback on children and suggest an increase in exploratory behaviour between childhood and adolescence.

Indexed as

LearningRewardAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthReinforcement, PsychologyBelief updatingChild developmentComputational modellingLearning ratesReinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID40595968
PMCPMC12216166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.