Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595954›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluating the generalizability of an automated coronary artery calcium segmentation and scoring algorithm using multi-vendor dataset.

Doyoung Park, Jedidiah Ng, Yixin Zhong, Chun Sheng Alvin Tan, Xiaomeng Wang, Gillianne Geet Yi Lai, Liang Zhong, Su Kai Gideon Ooi, Daniel Shao Weng Tan, Lohendran Baskaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Doyoung Park *CVS.AI, National Heart Research Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jedidiah Ng *Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yixin ZhongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Chun Sheng Alvin TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Xiaomeng WangCardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Gillianne Geet Yi LaiDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Liang ZhongDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Su Kai Gideon OoiDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Daniel Shao Weng TanDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Lohendran BaskaranCVS.AI, National Heart Research Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. lohendran_baskaran@duke-nus.edu.sg.

Funding

National Medical Research Council of Singapore CG21APR1006National Medical Research Council of Singapore NMRC/CG2/001a/2021NHCSSingHealth-Duke-NUS ACP NCRS grant 07/FY2021/P2/12-A93SingHealth-Duke-NUS ACP Philanthropy grant HRDUK230600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery calcification score (CACS), also known as the Agatston score, is a significant prognostic tool for cardiovascular disease (CVD) that utilizes computed tomography (CT). We expand our previously proposed algorithm, Residual-block Inspired Coordinate Attention U-Net (RICAU-Net), to evaluate its generalizability on CT data from previously unseen scanners for lesion-specific CAC segmentation. The multi-vendor datasets were 1,108 CT scans acquired by Siemens, GE, Philips, and Toshiba. We created four groups of datasets, using data from the three scanners as the training and validation sets, while the last one as the test set to evaluate the algorithm on data from previously unseen scanners. RICAU-Net was trained using the datasets for automatic lesion-specific CAC segmentation and calcium scoring. The performance of lesion-specific segmentation and calcium scoring were evaluated using per-lesion Dice scores and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). And Bland-Altman plot analysis was conducted to examine the agreement between the CAC score derived from the prediction results and the ground truth. The proposed algorithm exhibited a mean absolute difference of less than 5% between the per-lesion Dice scores of the validation and test sets, indicating good generalizability on test sets comprised of data from unseen scanners during the training and validation phases. ICC analysis demonstrates that the Agatston scores calculated using predictions from RICAU-Net and manual segmentation exhibited excellent reliability at the per-patient level across all groups with ICC and 95% confidence intervals: 0.95 (0.95-0.96), 0.99 (0.99-1.00), 0.99 (0.99-0.99), and 1.00 (0.99-1.00) for group 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Our algorithm demonstrates generalized performance on data from previously unseen scanners, making it potentially more suitable and practical for real-world clinical settings, where it will encounter diverse scanners from various organizations. Furthermore, a feasibility study using non-contrast chest CT scans indicates that the performance of our cardiac CT-trained algorithm on chest CT images was acceptable to a certain extent.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCalciumCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsVascular CalcificationAgedFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCalcium

Identifiers

PMID40595954
PMCPMC12219430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.