ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing warming strategies to reduce hypothermia and shivering in elderly abdominal or pelvic surgery patients: a network meta-analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07232251 (Evaluation of the Effects of Different Intraoperative Warming Techniques on Core Body Temperature and Hematologic Inflammatory Indices), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Effects of Different Intraoperative Warming Techniques on Core Body Temperature and Hematologic Inflammatory Indices (SII, NLR, PLR, LMR) in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypothermia and recovery outcomes before and after implementation of a multimodal perioperative temperature-management bundle in minimally invasive radical rectal cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Characteristics and Risk Factors of Intraoperative Hypothermia in Adults: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Clinical Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perioperative hypothermia (PHT) and shivering represent significant clinical challenges in geriatric surgical populations. This network meta-analysis (NMA) systematically evaluates the comparative efficacy of various warming interventions in preventing PHT and shivering among elderly patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and China Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to April 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed RCTs comparing warming strategies in patients aged ≥ 60 years undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Primary outcomes included incidence rates of PHT and shivering. A frequentist approach to NMA was performed using random-effects models, with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values calculated for treatment ranking. The analysis incorporated 18 RCTs (n = 2161) evaluating eight distinct warming strategies. Network meta-analysis revealed that forced-air warming with blankets at ≥ 40 °C (FABWH) demonstrated superior efficacy for PHT prevention, while forced-air warming at ≥ 40 °C (FAWH) showed optimal performance for shivering reduction. Compared to standard care, FABWH significantly reduced PHT risk (RR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.46; P = 0.0012) and shivering incidence (RR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.69; P = 0.008). FAWH exhibited comparable effectiveness, with risk reductions of 72% for PHT (RR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.58; P = 0.0006) and 84% for shivering (RR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.07-0.39; P < 0.001). This NMA provides robust evidence that active warming strategies, particularly FABWH and FAWH, significantly mitigate PHT and shivering risks in elderly surgical patients. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness analyses to optimize clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.