Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595930›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing blockchain transaction classification with ensemble learning approaches.

Amrutanshu Panigrahi, Abhilash Pati, Bibhuprasad Sahu, Rourab Paul, Ajit Kumar Nayak, Subrata Chowdhury, Ramya Govindaraj, J Shreyas

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amrutanshu PanigrahiDepartment of CSE, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Abhilash PatiDepartment of CSE, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Bibhuprasad SahuDepartment of Information Technology, Vardhaman College of Engineering (Autonomous), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Rourab PaulDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shiv Nadar University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ajit Kumar NayakDepartment of CS&IT, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Subrata ChowdhuryDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering and Technology (Autonomous), Chittoor, AP, India.
Ramya GovindarajSchool of Computer Science Engineering Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
J ShreyasDepartment of Information Technology, Manipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. Shreyas.j@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the emergence of Blockchain as Bitcoin, its development has progressed rapidly and attracted the attention of various researchers in academia and industry. Blockchain technology is becoming an increasingly secure and effective way to share information in various industries, including finance, supply chain management (SCM), and the Internet of Things (IoT). The increase in the number of Blockchain users demands malicious and non-malicious transactions to maintain the trust in Blockchain. This research aims to develop a machine learning (ML) based model for classifying blockchain transactions into risky or non-risky ones. The model comprises four feature selection approaches, including Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS), Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), Random Forest (RF), and Information Gain (IG). Then, two ensemble feature selection methods, known as rank averaging and rank aggregation, are applied to combine the features selected from the initial feature selection methods. Various ML classification algorithms are applied to the selected features from two ensemble feature selection algorithms as the base learners to make initial predictions. Finally, three different ensemble base classifiers, including hard voting, soft voting, and weighted averaging, are applied to these initial predictions to make the final prediction. Three blockchain transactional datasets are considered for evaluating the proposed ensemble-based model. The empirical analysis of the reported work shows that the maximum accuracy obtained using the Rank Averaging ensemble feature selection technique is 99.24%, whereas the maximum accuracy using the Rank Aggregation ensemble feature technique is 98.73%.

Indexed as

BlockchainEnsemble feature selectionMachine learningRank aggregationRank averaging

Identifiers

PMID40595930
PMCPMC12219324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.